Announcing a live link today from Orange County at Pleasants Pk with Yucipa, CA in San Bernardino County. Everyone was excited to see TxMbps solid links of 26Mbps in both directions. KI6BX-Keith and AI6SW-Shane are making a big splash in SBD County (and you all might recall KI6BX in the AREDN CERT forum).
Here's the details:
Pleasants Pk: Rocket M5 with 120 Sector coverage to Riverside and San Bernardino County
Yucipa: Rocket M5 with RocketDish.
We are seeing +20 SNR in both directions at 35.7 miles on 5Ghz ch 171 @ 10MHz .
From my QTH laptop in Mission Viejo, CA going over 9 routes, 4 RF links on 4 different channels and 2 bands, and about 70 miles, the latency looks like this:
[joe@ae6xe-1 ~]$ ping ai6bx-8-rm5-xw-test
PING ai6bx-8-rm5-xw-test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=353 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=9.52 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=32.5 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=8.33 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=28.8 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=241 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=151 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=49.1 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=14.1 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=21.5 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=11 ttl=56 time=133 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=12 ttl=56 time=31.0 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=13 ttl=56 time=22.4 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=14 ttl=56 time=19.9 ms
^C
--- ai6bx-8-rm5-xw-test.local.mesh ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 14 received, 0% packet loss, time 13038ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 8.335/79.793/353.589/100.676 ms
traceroute to ai6bx-8-rm5-xw-test (10.192.21.77), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 localnode.local.mesh (10.21.31.121) 0.402 ms 0.387 ms 0.446 ms
2 dtdlink.AE6XE-NSM3-QTH.local.mesh (10.11.138.7) 1.620 ms 1.557 ms 1.584 ms
3 AE6XE-Saddleback-RM3.local.mesh (10.14.33.27) 3.139 ms 4.546 ms 7.379 ms
4 dtdlink.AE6XE-Saddleback-RM5.local.mesh (10.165.24.232) 9.030 ms 9.961 ms 13.090 ms
5 W6LY-RM5-RDish-LagunaWoodsVillage--Saddleback.local.mesh (10.10.74.178) 13.064 ms 17.000 ms 19.638 ms
6 dtdlink.W6LY-RM5-RDish-LagunaWoodsVillage--PleasantsPk.local.mesh (10.165.38.64) 20.339 ms 24.036 ms 26.386 ms
7 KE6BXT-PleasantsPk-RM5-SW.local.mesh (10.192.14.194) 26.357 ms 26.673 ms 31.871 ms
8 dtdlink.KE6BXT-PleasantsPk-RM5-NE.local.mesh (10.253.213.11) 31.846 ms 57.302 ms 60.032 ms
9 AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77) 63.771 ms 77.038 ms 84.119 ms
I may be a little biased :) , but that's pretty impressive!
Hope you folks in Arizona are getting ready, we're headed your way. We can see Palm Springs and beyond now.
Joe AE6XE
Here's the details:
Pleasants Pk: Rocket M5 with 120 Sector coverage to Riverside and San Bernardino County
Yucipa: Rocket M5 with RocketDish.
We are seeing +20 SNR in both directions at 35.7 miles on 5Ghz ch 171 @ 10MHz .
From my QTH laptop in Mission Viejo, CA going over 9 routes, 4 RF links on 4 different channels and 2 bands, and about 70 miles, the latency looks like this:
[joe@ae6xe-1 ~]$ ping ai6bx-8-rm5-xw-test
PING ai6bx-8-rm5-xw-test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=353 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=9.52 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=32.5 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=8.33 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=28.8 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=241 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=151 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=49.1 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=14.1 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=21.5 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=11 ttl=56 time=133 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=12 ttl=56 time=31.0 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=13 ttl=56 time=22.4 ms
64 bytes from AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77): icmp_seq=14 ttl=56 time=19.9 ms
^C
--- ai6bx-8-rm5-xw-test.local.mesh ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 14 received, 0% packet loss, time 13038ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 8.335/79.793/353.589/100.676 ms
traceroute to ai6bx-8-rm5-xw-test (10.192.21.77), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 localnode.local.mesh (10.21.31.121) 0.402 ms 0.387 ms 0.446 ms
2 dtdlink.AE6XE-NSM3-QTH.local.mesh (10.11.138.7) 1.620 ms 1.557 ms 1.584 ms
3 AE6XE-Saddleback-RM3.local.mesh (10.14.33.27) 3.139 ms 4.546 ms 7.379 ms
4 dtdlink.AE6XE-Saddleback-RM5.local.mesh (10.165.24.232) 9.030 ms 9.961 ms 13.090 ms
5 W6LY-RM5-RDish-LagunaWoodsVillage--Saddleback.local.mesh (10.10.74.178) 13.064 ms 17.000 ms 19.638 ms
6 dtdlink.W6LY-RM5-RDish-LagunaWoodsVillage--PleasantsPk.local.mesh (10.165.38.64) 20.339 ms 24.036 ms 26.386 ms
7 KE6BXT-PleasantsPk-RM5-SW.local.mesh (10.192.14.194) 26.357 ms 26.673 ms 31.871 ms
8 dtdlink.KE6BXT-PleasantsPk-RM5-NE.local.mesh (10.253.213.11) 31.846 ms 57.302 ms 60.032 ms
9 AI6BX-8-RM5-XW-Test.local.mesh (10.192.21.77) 63.771 ms 77.038 ms 84.119 ms
I may be a little biased :) , but that's pretty impressive!
Hope you folks in Arizona are getting ready, we're headed your way. We can see Palm Springs and beyond now.
Joe AE6XE
Now we need to build that link from San Diego to San Bernardino (via Temecula) and the SoCA AREDN network will be nearly complete. Looking forward to it!
Andre, K6AH
Also I 2nd the link to San Diego via Temecula.
David
Just goes to show what a little planning in building out these networks can do!
I've always been impressed with the network my Northern Californian neigbors in Orange County have built and and been able to interconnect with.
Nice work all!
Keith - AI6BX