I wasn't sure if I was reading the news correctly here: http://www.arrl.org/news/ntia-targets-portion-of-3-4-ghz-band-for-potential-wireless-broadband-use
and here.
It looks as if Amateur Radio is going to lose a significant number of channels used for AREDN in the 3.4GHz band. Am I reading this wrong?
Will this have an impact on AREDN?
and here.
It looks as if Amateur Radio is going to lose a significant number of channels used for AREDN in the 3.4GHz band. Am I reading this wrong?
Will this have an impact on AREDN?
It's going to be a different ball game in the future with the use of this valuable bandwidth. The way 802.11 technologies are evolving, getting smarter and smarter, the idea is that a radio will negotiate with neighbor radios to find available frequency space and channel to use. Consider if a Wireless ISP, data link for a company, or a ham radio mesh radio did not have or need a channel selection. Rather it operated in a given band, and dynamically negotiated with all the other devices to optimize use of the available bandwidth and channels. No registration with a tower owner or entity to use specific frequencies, rather only registration of a band in use. The devices would talk to each other and change channel and bandwidth dynamically to find optimal data thoughput in the environment to co-exist with each other. The 802.11 specification would define how devices would decide what channel and bandwidth to use. If a transmitter was idle, other devices would dynamic start using the channel to increase overall thoughput for active traffic. If the entire band became congested, then everyone would share the limitation the same.
it puts Amateur Radio on equal footing with commercial interests for use of the space, when using the same technology and overlapping frequencies. Maybe we'll see devices doing this in 10 years or so, maybe sooner.
Joe AE6XE
Seems to be moving kinda that way now if this site is accurate: https://www.howtogeek.com/368332/wi-fi-6-what%e2%80%99s-different-and-why-it-matters/
IEEE be damned, let's dumb this down for the sheeple.
sigh,
- Don - AA7AU (apologies for the mini-rant)
I don't mean to sound cynical, but if we don't have active lobbyist representation fighting for the bands that we use here with AREDN, we will incrementally loose it. I already see telecoms preparing to infringe on our 9cm band (3.3-3.5GHz) and the higher end of our 5cm band (5.9GHz).
I'm not trying to alarm anybody, just trying to assuage folks from being passive.
Is there a way to donate to ARRL Legislative Action Program? Are they even fighting to keep our spectrum?
-Damon K9CQB