---------Randy, WU2S, recently posted this on the BBHN Forum---------
Putting feature-sets aside for a minute, I think this is what differentiates AREDN from BBHN:
Putting feature-sets aside for a minute, I think this is what differentiates AREDN from BBHN:
Where BBHN is geared for the hobbyist who finds cool things to do with mesh networks, like Field Day logging, neighborhood networks, Internet sharing, etc., AREDN’s focus is robust, high-performance, ham-supported Hastily Formed Networks (HFN) for disaster response and humanitarian emergencies.
In these scenarios the served-agencies are dependent on well-planned infrastructure which works, and well-trained individuals that know how to use the communications devices they bring.
You would not simply show-up to one of these incidents and expect to become part of the solution… you would far more likely become part of a problem:
- Not having drilled with the agency you would be completely unfamiliar with their procedures and protocol.
- Your node may, or may not, be configured consistent with the network plan, as NG5V has pointed out.
- Your PC may have a virus or other malware which could infect other PCs, or for that matter, your nodes could infect the entire mesh network affecting first-responders and placing their safety in jeopardy; (ref recent Ubiquiti press: “Foul-mouthed worm takes control of wireless ISPs around the globe”).
- Without basic knowledge of how your nodes operate and are configured, you will not be able to perform basic troubleshooting of links and their performance.
Even from a historical standpoint, you would never show up to support an emergency without knowing how to operate and configure your VHF/UHF radio.
So in the end, it all comes down to your specific use-case. If you intend to utilize mesh networking for cool, hobby related purposes, then BBHN is for you. Linksys, the primary device they espouse, will serve you well, and there’s no need to worry about future firmware upgradeability because they already do all the things you will ever need them to do. However, if your intended use involves HFNs for disaster agencies and their responders, then the only choice is AREDN.
As you and Randy are here, thank you both !!
Well put and very valid information.
While the infrastructure for any area may be quasi permanent, EmComm Deployments will be HFNs.
Acknowledging that distinction might help plot a path forward.
73, ...dan wl7coo
Well Dan, I can't say I wasn't influenced by Cisco here... without saying too much more ;-)
Thanks for the comment, and for turning over rocks <g>
Andre, K6AH
I'll be saving up for a Ubiquiti. Thanks for the info!
73 KM4PSL (Joseph)