You are here

UBNT Rocket M5 Freq Limits; OEM FW return

6 posts / 0 new
Last post
N6LDJ
UBNT Rocket M5 Freq Limits; OEM FW return
Hi:

My OEM UBNT M5 seems to have a top center frequency of 5825 MHz (20 MHz ch).  Could someone confirm that by using AREDN firmware this can move up to 5920/Ch 184 (5 MHz?)

Once we place AREDN firmware on these devices, can they ever be taken back to factory/OEM firmware?  

Can the factory firmware be read or backed-up before upgrading to AREDN? 

Thanks
K6CCC
K6CCC's picture
Yes, when you load AREDN
Yes, when you load AREDN firmware, the frequency limit is not an issue.  I have no idea if you can reload UBNT firmware - but I assume so.
 
nc8q
nc8q's picture
UBNT Ubiquiti Rocket firmware restore

Once we place AREDN firmware on these devices, can they ever be taken back to factory/OEM firmware?
Yes.

Can the factory firmware be read or backed-up before upgrading to AREDN?
Not to my knowledge.
You can likely download your current firmware from Ubiquiti: https://ui.com/download/airmax-m/ .
Then restore it later with the TFTP method.

Could someone confirm that by using AREDN firmware this can move up to 5920/Ch 184 (5 MHz?)
Yes, but 5 MHz is not recommended.
5 MHz bandwidth is needed when the distance between nodes is greater than 44 miles.
Why are you considering 5 MHz bandwidth?
Why are you considering the highest channel?

73, Chuck

N6LDJ
Thanks for all the help.
Thanks for all the help.

"Yes, but 5 MHz is not recommended.
5 MHz bandwidth is needed when the distance between nodes is greater than 44 miles.
Why are you considering 5 MHz bandwidth?"

I typically run this on long distances (to improve threshold) or when I have path anomalies.   Looking for high quality/stability and don't need high throughput (used to transport a few VoIP applications).       

"Why are you considering the highest channel?"

That is just the way I poorly worded it  :)  I don't need to use that specific one.  I noted 5 MHz to express that the band edge is 2.5 MHz above that specified center frequency.  

I am interested in why you recommend against using 5 MHz channels. 

Greg
nc8q
nc8q's picture
long distance, anomalies, quality, stability, choosing to reduce
long distance3, anomalies, quality, stability, choosing to reduce throughput, and Mikrotik@5Mhz.

Hi, Greg:

Mikrotik does not play well with other manufacturers at 5 MHz bandwidth.
IMHO, as long as there is sufficient SNR in a link, bandwidth does not affect quality nor stability.
If your 'long distances' are ~44 miles or more, 5 MHz bandwidth is a good choice.
If more than 2 stations share a channel, a wider bandwidth may grant more channel availability.

73, Chuck

 
N6LDJ
Thanks Chuck - good
Thanks Chuck - good information.   

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer